The Earnings of State Government Employees in the United States

نویسنده

  • GEORGE J. BORJAS
چکیده

In 1979 there were 3.7 million state government employees (SGE’s) in the United States, with a monthly payroll of $3.9 billion. This state government employment represented a sizable increase from the 1970 level of 2.8 million workers.’ Recent work by Smith [1977] provides evidence of a wage differential between SGE’s and private sector workers. She finds that (male) wage rates are about 8% higher in the public sector. However, controlling for observable socioeconomic characteristics reverses this finding and leads to a 3-11% wage differential favoring the private sector.2 Although Smith’s study presents interesting statistics, it does not provide much insight into employment policies followed by state governments which lead to their wage and employment levels. This paper provides a behavioral foundation by shifting the focus from a comparison of state government/private sector wage levels to a study of wage differentials among SGE’s employed by different states. The framework used in the analysis extends my earlier work on wage policy in the federal bureaucracy [see Bojas, 1980,1982]. It is assumed that state governments view personnel policies as a political tool, and that the policies followed are those that have the highest political returns. This model yields implications regarding variations in sizes of state governments, the number of SGE’s, and the SGE wage as a function of the relevant political factors in the state. Table 1 summarizes state government employment statistics. The first column gives the number of SGE’s in 1970 for the largest 15 states. Column

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Contextualizing Obesity and Diabetes Policy: Exploring a Nested Statistical and Constructivist Approach at the Cross-National and Subnational Government Level in the United States and Brazil

Background This article conducts a comparative national and subnational government analysis of the political, economic, and ideational constructivist contextual factors facilitating the adoption of obesity and diabetes policy.   Methods We adopt a nested analytical approach to policy analysis, which combines cross-national statistical analysis with subnational case study comparisons to examine...

متن کامل

دولت ملت‌سازی در جهان اسلام و سیاست جهانی آمریکا در دوران معاصر

After World War II, United States became a global superpower in the world. Although with having little experience in the war with other countries and the emergence of new states in these countries, the US entered the realm of nation-building with the change of government in Germany and Japan. The establishment of the United Nations at this time did not contribute much to the issue of nation-sta...

متن کامل

The United States Sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran; from Unilateralism to Violations of International Human Rights

Today, the global system is formed based on multilateralism, which is based on international relations and the origin of international organizations and institutions. But this matter is endangered by the unilateralism pursued by the United States of America. Coercive unilateral measures such as sanctions, threats, military intervention, and even measures such as withdrawal from international tr...

متن کامل

رویکرد فرهنگی ایالات متحده امریکا در عراق 2014 (تحلیل محتوای فعالیت‌های آژانس توسعه بین‌المللی ایالات متحده در عراق)

The Iraq war of 2003 was the dawn of both soft and hard impact and influence of the United States of America in this country. After the evacuation of American militants and the end of military presence in Iraq, United States continued its influence through cultural diplomacy and soft power. Unites states agency for international development as one of the most critical tools of cultural diplomac...

متن کامل

On Why the United States Should Not Attack Iran: A Conservative, Evangelical Christian Response

In the midst of American intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq, and in the aftermath of the presidential election in Iran, support for American involvement in Iran has increased in some circles. In this piece, our desire is to give a conservative, evangelical Christian response to why America should not support any military action against Iran. A position advocated by many of us is “Just War.” I...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003